top of page

There are many things you can do. Here is one thing. Are you aware that there is a complaint process? A friend sent through some information I am sharing with you:

Across Australia in the six states and two territories, there are statutory bodies known as Health Care Complaints Commissions or alike. Each body operates under its own statute. In terms of explaining in general terms what the bodies undertake, detailed below is an extract from the New South Wales Health Care Complaints Act 1993. Section 3 of the Act states:


HEALTH CARE COMPLAINTS ACT 1993 - SECTION 3 Object and principle of administration of Act

  1. The primary object of this Act is to establish the Health Care Complaints Commission as an independent body for the purposes of—

    1. receiving and assessing complaints under this Act relating to health services and health service providers in New South Wales, and

    2. investigating and assessing whether any such complaint is serious and if so, whether it should be prosecuted, and

    3. prosecuting serious complaints, and

    4. resolving or overseeing the resolution of complaints.

  2. In the exercise of functions under this Act the protection of the health and safety of the public must be the paramount consideration.

Each of the other seven jurisdictions have Acts with a similar provision.


Below is two lists: 1) A list of details of the respective state and territory bodies including their name, the Commissioner (or other title), mailing address, telephone/email contact information and the links to make a complaint. Click this link "Health Care Complaints Bodies" 2) Below is a table linking to the respective state and territory Acts. It may be the case that scope exists under the respective statutes to pursue formal complaints regarding the way in which some children and young people have been and/or are being treated with respect to gender dysphoria issues,


Some of you may already have had experience dealing either directly or indirectly with one or more of these complaints bodies. Therefore, as you are aware, careful consideration including in some cases formal legal advice should be sought before commencing proceedings.

The purpose of this post is to draw to your attention, if you are not already aware, the details of these complaints bodies. I am not qualified to provide legal advice about whether a matter should be considered to be referred to these complaints bodies. That will be a matter for individuals to consider, obtain advice and make a final decision. Nevertheless, it is worth being aware of these complaints bodies and what may be the potential for individuals to pursue matters before them regarding concerns in the way in which some children and young people have been and/or are being treated with respect to gender dysphoria issues.




 
 

Our members of Active Watchful Waiting[i] are a mixed group; parents, teachers, health professionals, detransitioners, transexual and members of the LGB community. And I would say, despite our differences and diversity what unites us is our deep concern at the pipelining of young people onto the conveyor belt of products and services that underpins the profits of the gender affirmation industry[ii]. The major profiteers of this industry being the medical and pharmaceutical organisations.[iii] The major brand of this industry is ‘gender identity,’ to be your ‘authentic self’ via a product line drugs and surgeries. It’s core target market is the youth, LGB, Autistic, vulnerable youth with mental health comorbidities[iv] and young girls susceptible to social influence and contagion. With regards to this bill on the table it’s playing it’s part in the ‘gender affirmation’ process in two ways. One being part of the social transition process and two through legitimising the conversion therapy process of LGB children.


So, one, ‘social transition’ starts with documentation. In schools it involves the referencing of and recording of student’s gender identity, new name and pronouns, clothing and bathroom use, etc. [v]


--Changing the sex on the birth certificate is taking the child’s social transitioning to another level, altogether.


This is not a neutral act[vi], most youth if pushed to socially transition will move onto the second stage which is medical transitioning[vii]. This involves taking of chemical castration and endometriosis drugs used to interfere or ‘block’ puberty[viii], cross-sex hormones and the last stage is extreme body modification (mastectomies and physical castration).

Instead of a future healthy life with body undamaged, these children who medically transition are set on course for lifetime pharma-co-logical dependence and increased risk of cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, thrombosis, sterility, and probable sexual dysfunction.


This bill takes an active part in this gender affirmation process because it does not just note the ‘gender identity,’ what the child feels about themselves at that time, it legally falsifies the child’s sex, it is dubious that this bill is affirming an existing ‘transgender identity’ it is for most youth creating[ix] a transgender identity. Because without this type of interference children that have an incongruence or disconnect with their body, up to 80- 98% of them will grow out of it once through puberty.


Furthermore, more than two thirds of those youth who would normally grow out of this will grow up to be gay or bisexual, as there is a high correlation[x] with gender non-conformance, homosexuality and bisexuality. What children are told if they are gender nonconforming is they are ‘born in the wrong body’ because they have a “gender identity” that does not match the gender norms or behaviour expected of their sex. In line with this idea, a female child more likely to grow up lesbian is expected to present as a (trans) boy, and a gender non-conforming male child is expected to identify as a (trans) girl.

Once a child is identified as trans, state education policies, Victoria State schools for example make a ‘gender affirmation plan’ so these impressionable LGB young people effectively are groomed to conform to a heterosexual norm. This is conversion therapy[xi]. LGB organisations like LGB Defence, Coalition of Activist Lesbians, LGB Alliance Australia and LGB Tasmania call it ‘transing the gay away.’


The other distinct cohort is girls. Before 2012, gender dysphoria in the past was almost exclusively boys (roughly .01%). But girls[xii] are now the majority of children who are transitioning, and this is more to do with gender ideation, a fixation on a gender identity, through social influence[xiii] and contagion. There are more than 95[xiv] gender identities thus far.


In research they are commonly referred to though as having ROGD[xv], rapid onset gender dysphoria. My co-founder of AWW also runs Australian Parents of ROGD kids,

she deals with 4-5 calls a week from distraught and desperate parents of these girls.

She told me recently of a typical call, a sobbing father called through desperate to stop his 15 year old daughter from cutting off her breasts. In the state he’s in if he denies her, this is child abuse, and he could lose her to the family court system, so she could be taken from her home as have many others.


Under the family court system there are criminal sanctions if he speaks of this. So, he – and he is one of over 1000 of these parents she has dealt with in the last 7 years, are gagged.

They suffer in silence and the system keeps most Australians in the dark on this reality. This movement is not a grass roots movement; self-Id laws are one of several laws the trans gender lobbies’ handbook[xvi] (Only Adults? Good practices for legal recognition for youth) instructs trans lobbies to be put into place to enable children to be transitioned. Sex should in no way be removed, conflated or be replaced with ‘gender identity’ in law. We should affirm all people’s birth sex as their legal sex, while ensuring all people protection from discrimination or interference based on their gender non-conforming appearance or behaviour, that’s’ all. Catherine Anderson-Karena Active Watchful Waiting Inc.

[i] https://lostintransition.org/about [ii] The Business model of youth transitioning https://youtu.be/WH1hV0DkA6U https://www.lostintransition.org/post/the-gender-industry-international-project-part-3a [iii] https://jbilek.substack.com/p/big-pharma-big-tech-and-synthetic? [iv] https://statsforgender.org/comorbidity/ https://statsforgender.org/autism/ [v] https://www.lostintransition.org/victoriapolicy https://www.lostintransition.org/nswpolicy [vi] Social transition – changing names, pronouns, clothing and bathroom use – correlates with the persistence of transgender identity. Paediatric transition doctors in the Netherlands who first pioneered the use of puberty blockers in dysphoric children observe that social transition correlates with an increase in young people’s persistence when it comes to gender identity [1]. This led them to caution against social transition before puberty. Another paper [2] notes that gender dysphoria is more persistent into adolescence where social transition has occurred, and as such asserts that social transition is a “psychosocial intervention [which] might be characterized as iatrogenic” – a medical problem caused by the treatment itself. There is evidence [3] that social transition by the child was found to be strongly correlated with persistence for natal boys, more so than for girls. REFERENCES [1] de Vries, A. L., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2012). Clinical management of gender dysphoria in children and adolescents: The Dutch approach. Journal of Homosexuality 59 (3): 301–320. [Link] [2] Zucker, K. J. (2019). Debate: Different strokes for different folks. Child and Adolescent Mental Health 25(1): 36-37. [Link] [3] Steensma, T.D., McGuire, J.K., Kreukels, B.P., Beekman, A.J. & Cohen-Kettenis, P.T. (2013). Factors associated with desistence and persistence of childhood gender dysphoria: a quantitative follow-up study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 52 (6): 582-90. [Link] One study showed that, without social transition, nearly two-thirds of pre-teen gender-dysphoric males grow up to be gay or bisexual. A University of Toronto study [1] found that 63.6% of boys with early onset gender dysphoria, who received ‘watchful waiting’ treatment and no pre-pubertal social transition, grew up to be gay or bisexual. Only 12% of the study participants continued to identify as transfeminine. REFERENCES [1] Singh, D., Bradley, S.J. & Zucker, K.J. (2021). A Follow-Up Study of Boys With Gender Identity Disorder. Frontiers in Psychology 12. [Link] [vii] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11341001/NHS-discourage-social-transitioning-gender-questioning-children.html?ito=email_share_article-top https://statsforgender.org/medical-transition/ [viii]https://www.lostintransition.org/puberty-blockers-are-harmful [ix] https://statsforgender.org/teenagers/ [x] https://statsforgender.org/sexuality/ [xi] https://www.lgbdefence.org/post/gender-affirmation-transing-the-gay-away [xii] https://statsforgender.org/females/ [xiii]https://statsforgender.org/social-influence/ [xiv] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_gender_identities [xv] https://www.lostintransition.org/rogd [xvi]Only Adults? Good practices in legal gender recognition for youthhttps://www.lostintransition.org/post/the-gender-industry-international-project-part-3a The Denton’s handbook. Dentons, partnered with media conglomerate Thomson-Reuters to create a Trans Gender Diverse (TGD advocacy handbook, colloquially called the Denton’s Handbook, entitled; “Only Adults? Good practices in legal gender recognition for youth.” (https://www.iglyo.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/IGLYO_v3-1.pdf) It focuses on strategies to mitigate the gender industry’s business risks. It also sets out 8-9 common goals for trans lobbies to pursue which creates alignment for advocacy across the world. i.e., in relation to minors Extending the process (self-id gender recognition) to minors” (pg. 16) · Remove parental consent to medical & social transitioning to the appearance of the opposite sex · Remove parental consent to the legal recognition of minors, e.g., in schools a child affirmed to be a ‘mature minor’ in order to transition without parental consent or knowledge.



 
 

No. Many parents have been told if they do not comply with 'gender affirmation care' their child will commit suicide. This trans rights narrative causes much concern but is not supported by facts. Every suicide is a tragedy, and one suicide is a suicide too many. However, with such a serious issue, accuracy is critical.

Please refer to Suicide Facts and Myths and https://www.statsforgender.org/suicide/ for succinct statistics on the following key facts on suicide for gender dysphoric youth:

  • One long-ranging study estimated a suicide rate for gender dysphoric people of 0.6%.

  • There is no high-quality evidence to suggest that the overall attempted suicide rate of transgender youth is 41%

  • People with psychiatric conditions – and sometimes neurodiverse conditions – are much more likely to die by suicide than gender dysphoric people.

  • Suicide rarely has one cause: it is difficult for statistical studies on suicide to extricate gender dysphoria from other factors.

  • There is little evidence that medical transition decreases suicidality.

This means a one-size fits all solution for gender dysphoria will be harmful to the majority of youth.

So, what we hear from Gender Clinics, the trans lobbies of ILGA and their affiliates and ardent gender identitarians to hijack our emotions and bypass our reason, to pressure parents and the general public into compliance with drugs, hormones or surgery for children has been;
“Better a live son rather than a dead daughter.”
But understand this, no parent will end up with a son from a daughter through body modification. Nor will they retain a fully functional daughter or son. What transition creates is a chemically altered child mimicking old-fashioned ideas of gender norms. No one wants a distressed daughter to kill herself. But there is no evidence that children will commit suicide if they do not transition. Even so, no ethical doctor would ever treat a suicidal girl by cutting her breasts off, an anorexic with gastric banding, or an autistic with chemical castration. No grown-up should accept emotional blackmail from children or fringe activists, to give children things that would harm them. The idea that any doctor would allow children to diagnose the cause of their own distress, and then prescribe their own treatment, is gross malpractice.

All of this is reckless. We need to be adults. Australian children deserve safety and ethical care.


 
 

Copyright 2022 by (Active Watchful Waiting inc.)

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
bottom of page